CANDIDATES FOR CHAIRMAN OF THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY – PART 1: DAVID HADLEY

At the time of this writing, there are three candidates running for Chairman of the California Republican Party, David Hadley, Steve Frank, and Travis Allen.  I am going to publish each of their candidate statements here so that Delegates to the CRP can have ready access to the information prior to their voting.  The first statement will be from David Hadley, the second from Steve Frank, and the Third from Travis Allen.  These statements were originally published in the FlashReport.

Continue reading “CANDIDATES FOR CHAIRMAN OF THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY – PART 1: DAVID HADLEY”

CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS DON’T NEED VOTER FRAUD TO LOSE WHEN DEMOCRATS CAN SIMPLY CHANGE THE RULES

CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS DON’T NEED VOTER FRAUD TO LOSE WHEN DEMOCRATS CAN SIMPLY CHANGE THE RULES

When a 14-point Republican lead disappears

By Shawn Steel, Former Chairman of the California Republican Party and Republican National Committeeman from California to the RNC
November 27, 2018   The Washington Times

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Young Kim was poised to become the first Korean-American woman elected to Congress.

Her 14-point lead was the lone bright spot on an otherwise dismal night for Orange County Republicans. But, over the past week, Republicans have watched the first-generation immigrant’s lead evaporate. With thousands of provisional ballots left to count, her commanding lead is now underwater.

She lost one week after the election.

Continue reading “CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS DON’T NEED VOTER FRAUD TO LOSE WHEN DEMOCRATS CAN SIMPLY CHANGE THE RULES”

VOTER GUIDE FOR CANDIDATES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR THE NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION

VOTER GUIDE FOR CANDIDATES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR THE NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION

My personal recommendations for the California November 6, 2018 Election.

I want to be clear that while I am Treasurer of the Republican Party of Los Angeles County, the following recommendations are my personal recommendations, and are not official Republican Party endorsements, although in most cases my recommendations will be the same as the official Party endorsements.

Gary Aminoff
info@larepublicans.org

Continue reading “VOTER GUIDE FOR CANDIDATES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR THE NOVEMBER 2018 ELECTION”

CALIFORNIA’S RACIAL POLITICS HARMS MINORITIES

CALIFORNIA’S RACIAL POLITICS HARMS MINORITIES

By Joel Kotkin and Wendell Cox

Across the country, white voters placed Donald Trump in office by a margin of 21 points over Clinton. Their backing helped the GOP gain control of a vast swath of local offices nationwide. But in California, racial politics are pushing our general politics the other direction, way to the left.

Continue reading “CALIFORNIA’S RACIAL POLITICS HARMS MINORITIES”

GROW UP!

GROW UP!

By Thomas Sowell

Of all the many things said about Donald Trump, what was said by Roger Ailes, head of the Fox News Channel, said it all in just two words: “Grow up!”

It is amazing how many people have been oblivious to this middle-aged man’s spoiled brat behavior, his childish boastfulness about things he says he is going to do, and his petulant response to every criticism with ad hominem replies.

Continue reading “GROW UP!”

PC IS ABOUT CONTROL

PC IS ABOUT CONTROL

“Political correctness is the conscious, designed manipulation of language intended to change the way people speak, write, think, feel, and act, in furtherance of an agenda.”

[This appears in the November–December 2015 issue of The Austrian.]

I’d like to speak today about what political correctness is, at least in its modern version, what it is not, and what we might do to fight against it.

To begin, we need to understand that political correctness is not about being nice. It’s not simply a social issue or a subset of the culture wars.

Continue reading “PC IS ABOUT CONTROL”

John Stossel: I Can Balance The Budget

By John Stossel

The Congressional Budget Office says the current year’s budget deficit will be a record $1.5 trillion. It also says that over the next decade we’re on track for annual deficits of “only” $768 billion. I suspect the CBO has hired Rosy Scenario to do the bookkeeping, but let’s take that number at face value.

I’m now going to balance the budget, with the help of some experts.

I’ll begin with things I’m most eager to cut. Let’s privatize air traffic control. Canada did it, and it works better. Then privatize Amtrak. Get rid of all subsidies for rail. That’ll save $12 billion.

End subsidies for public broadcasting, like NPR. Cancel the Small Business Administration. Repeal the Davis-Bacon rules under which the government pays union-set wages to workers on federal construction projects. Cut foreign aid by half (although we should probably get rid of all of it). So far, that’s $20 billion.
Oops. That doesn’t dent the deficit. We have to do much more.

So eliminate the U.S. Education Department. We’d save $94 billion. Federal involvement doesn’t improve education. It gets in the way.

Agriculture subsidies cost us $30 billion a year. Let’s get rid of them. They distort the economy. We should also eliminate Housing and Urban Development. That’s $53 billion more.

Who needs the Energy Department and its $20 billion sinkhole? The free market should determine energy investments.

And let’s end the war on drugs. In effect, it’s a $47 billion subsidy for thugs in the black market.

I’ve already cut more than six times more than President Obama proposed in his State of the Union address. His freeze of nondefense discretionary spending would save only $40 billion.

But my cuts still total only $246 billion. If we’re going to get rid of the rest of the CBO’s projected deficit, we must attack the “untouchable” parts of the budget, starting with Social Security. Raising the retirement age and indexing benefits to inflation would save $93 billion. I’d save more by privatizing Social Security, but our progressive friends won’t like that, so for now I’ll ignore privatization.

The biggest budget busters are Medicare and Medicaid, and get this: the 400 subsidy programs run by HHS. Assuming I take just two-thirds of the Cato Institute’s suggested cuts, that saves $281 billion.

How about the Defense Department’s $721 billion? Much of that money could be saved if the administration just shrank the military’s mission to its most important role: protecting us and our borders from those who wish us harm. Today, we have more than 50,000 soldiers in Germany, 30,000 in Japan and 9,000 in Britain. Those countries should pay for their own defense. Cato’s military cuts add up to $150 billion.

I’ve now cut enough to put us $2 billion in surplus!

Can we go further?

“Repeal Obamacare,” syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock said.
Reason magazine editor Matt Welch wants to cut the Department of Homeland Security, “something that we did without 10 years ago.”

But don’t we need Homeland Security to keep us safe?

“We already have law enforcement in this country that pays attention to these things. This is a heavily bureaucratized organization.

“Cut the Commerce Department,” Mary O’Grady of The Wall Street Journal said. “If you take out the census work that it does, you would save $8 billion. And the rest of what it does is really just collect money for the president from business.”

As the bureaucrats complain about proposals to make tiny cuts, it’s good to remember that disciplined government could make cuts that get us to a surplus in one year. But even a timid Congress could make swift progress if it wanted to. If it just froze spending at today’s levels, it would almost balance the budget by 2017. If spending were limited to 1 percent growth each year, the budget would balanced in 2019. And if the crowd in Washington would limit spending growth to about 2 percent a year, the red ink would almost disappear in 10 years.

As you see, the budget can be cut. Only politics stand in the way.

John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on the Fox Business Network. He’s the author of “Give Me a Break” and of “Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity.” To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at johnstossel.com