Max Baucus Admits To Being A Communist

Well, maybe not exactly in those words, but he said this:

In an unusual speech on the Senate floor moments ago, Max Baucus declares that the “healthcare bill” to be “an income shift, it is a shift, a leveling to help lower income middle income Americans.” Baucus continued, “[t]oo often, much of late, the last couple three years the mal-distribution of income in America is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy, and the middle income class is left behind. Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America.”

That is exactly what Communists believe, so Max Baucus is clearly a secret Communist. I suspect most “progressive” Democrats agree with him.

Max Baucus is the Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and the Democrat most responsible fo Obamacare’s final shape other than Nancy Pelosi.

Baucus’ candor is appreciated, though the fact that he waited until the bill passed to announce the real agenda behind the massive tax hikes isn’t a profile in courage. And the seniors on fixed income who are about to lose Medicare Advantage would laugh at Baucus’ pseudo-populism. (h/t Hugh Hewitt)

You can see the video below.

We all knew that the Obamacare bill wasn’t about healthcare. There were many ways to achieve healthcare reform that would have cost a fraction of the cost of the Obamacare bill. There had to be more to it. Sen. Baucus has admitted that there was and defined it as a massive redistribution of wealth in America.

The Democrat Party will be remembered as the party responsible for destroying the capitalist system, along with freedom, in America. Now only they can determine how much you have the right to earn. And only they have the right to determine how much you have to give up from your capital to give to those who weren’t as successful as you.

The Statue of Liberty is shedding tears. When asked by a citizen, “What have you made?”, after coming out of the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin retorted, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” Sadly, it doesn’t appear that we can.

We cannot let the statists and the Marxists continue to run this country. America was founded as the Land of the Free, where citizens can be free to live their lives with minimal interference from their government. We must take it back. We have to see that conservative Republicans are elected in November so we can take back the House of Representatives

Does Anyone Still Doubt That Obama is a Marxist/Socialist?

Is there anyone who still doubts that Obama is either a pure Marxist or a Socialist? Has America come so far since the Reagan era that it is prepared to throw away our American way of life for a man who wishes the Constitution allowed wealth redistribution in this country?

Writing at GetLiberty.org, Carter Clews says,

First, let’s get one thing straight: government in and of itself has not, cannot, and will not ever create wealth. That’s because government produces no marketable product, and, therefore, has nothing to sell for which it can charge a legitimate price and run up a tab. So, if government decides to “redistribute the wealth,” it first must take it from those who create it. And that’s what makes Barack Obama’s socialist mindset so dangerous to a productive society.

Lest anyone had any remaining doubts about what Mr. Obama really meant when he told the now-famous “Joe the Plumber” that he (Barack Obama) wanted to “share the wealth,” yesterday’s disclosure of the Senator’s 2001 Public Radio interview should close the loop. As he so often does when not befriended by his teleprompter, Mr. Obama let slip with the truth in 2001, just as he did on the rope line with Joe. And it is a truth most hardworking Americans would do well to take with them to the voting booth on November 4. Said Mr. Obama:

“But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of the wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break us free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution … And the Warren Court interpreted, in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties … I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change.”

For those who may have difficulty deciphering Mr. Obama’s unscripted bloviations, it’s all very simple (despite his campaign’s frenzied denials): Barack Obama is a socialist who believes in taking from the haves and giving to the have nots. Lest anyone take umbrage at such a characterization, let’s get one other thing straight (in addition to the fact that government has not and cannot create wealth): There is absolutely nothing wrong with a socialist running for President of the United States. But, there is something dreadfully wrong with that socialist denying his own ideology — even when his own words betray his denials.

If the majority of the voters in this country decide they want to elect a socialist who wants to redistribute the wealth, that is their business, and their right. But for Mr. Obama to continue to dissimulate about his own intentions undermines the very foundation of free and fair elections. And that is wrong.

The above portion of Mr. Obama’s 2001 admission has been the most frequently repeated over the past 24 hours. But, it was actually a separate passage that most starkly betrayed his true socialistic proclivities. Explaining the real import of “economic justice,” as he likes to term it, he let slip: “I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth …”

That, in sum, is what Barack Obama and his socialist comrades really mean by “redistributing the wealth.” It’s not just providing equal opportunity for everyone to be able to sit at the counter and order what they will – it is making sure that when the check comes, it can be handed to someone else to pay.

And now, it’s up to hardworking Americans nationwide to decide for themselves on November 4 if they really want to pick up that tab.

My guess is that if America decides to elect this socialist to become the President of the United States it will be because they are so mesmerized by his charisma, and so taken with the fact that he is an African-American, that they are willing to overlook his anti-American economic and political policies. How sad for this great country if that is what happens.

Technorati Tags: ,,,